Alright, so I run a Web site named HackCollege. It’s a blog for college students. We’ve also produced video segments in the past.
While we could take the “We’re poor college students” approach to music and images, we have always tried to take the high road and never use copyrighted materials in our videos. Several of our videos have recently been invited to participate in the YouTube rev-sharing program.
There are some songs that a friend made for us as a favor. There was no record of the transaction other than a simple verbal conversation. He just had the tracks laying around and was just gave them to us. But because we don’t have a paper-trail tying the song rights to us, YouTube is punishing us. They invited and then subsequently denied us to the rev-sharing program. For using music, we are automatically viewed as potential criminals until we prove ourselves innocent (which I’m not sure quite how to do). The inadequate automation is hurting both YouTube and us (neither of us are making money on the video).
The video in question is the “How to Build a Homemade A/C.”
mikehudack is right on this one. I’m not familiar with YouTube’s policy on proving/refuting infringement, but legally...
I agree with Mike on this; in my past experiences dealing with YouTube, they have been reasonable in their requests and...
I think even more to the point is that YouTube’s history with Viacom, and reliance on big ticket partners such as...
The DMCA is not to blame...DMCA should prevent this problem. It’s